![]() 02/06/2015 at 12:20 • Filed to: Pegaso | ![]() | ![]() |
Not often you see a Pegaso
![]() 02/06/2015 at 12:23 |
|
I love this, where the two windows meet. So classy.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 12:29 |
|
Those exhausts are classy.
Also, what is a Pegaso?
![]() 02/06/2015 at 12:33 |
|
Google is your friend!
![]() 02/06/2015 at 12:41 |
|
I love Pegaso! They're gorgeous and underrated/basically unknown. I love the Z102 especially but this one look very inviting. Z102 Coupe?
![]() 02/06/2015 at 12:50 |
|
Wow, I really like their older trucks, for some reason:
![]() 02/06/2015 at 13:22 |
|
Mmm dat Z-102. Looks like Serra or early Pegaso coachwork.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 13:31 |
|
It's the weird rear light treatment that caught my eye.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 13:36 |
|
Anyone? Lol.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 13:38 |
|
Yeah! Very unconventional, looks like fangs! And those partially exposed tailpipes, too... So many interesting elements on this car.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 14:33 |
|
You've seen something similar before!
![]() 02/06/2015 at 14:34 |
|
That's a unique solution to the "where the hell do we put the taillights?" conundrum. It looks like it just sucked on a lemon.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 15:08 |
|
Beautiful rear.
Beautiful side profile. Just look at those flowing lines.
No too sure about the front though. The vertical in the grille takes something away from the overall look and that bonnet really isn't for me at all.
The 50s truly were the golden age for car beauty. The 1900s were a time of invention, the 20s for speed, the 50s for beauty and grace, with everything up to the 90s being of mass production and now a return to speed with maybe too much emphasis on technology that is pushing the driver further and further away from being the dominant of car over machine to subservient to his own desire for the best technology.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 15:18 |
|
Yes, absolutely!
But my brain was stuck on something more like a late-50s Ford Fairlane 4-door hardtop:
![]() 02/06/2015 at 15:35 |
|
Note how the front treatment matches that of the rear lights.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 15:41 |
|
Ye', not exactly sure about the rear element you refer to but on the front it looks too much while the grille looks like it hasn't received the same sort of attention.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 15:45 |
|
I mean how the boot lid mirrors the bonnet with lights on one and fake grilles on the other.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 16:53 |
|
Yes. I thought that was what you were referring to. The faux grille on the bonnet breaks up the flowing lines too much too much. I just don't like it.
If the faux grille was up on the pain body of the bonnet it might work for me but on the leading edge of the bonnet is quite harsh.
Other cars of that era either had no grille, vertical slat grille ot horizontal slat grille. The Dodge Avenger-esque grille looks uninspired and plain.
![]() 02/06/2015 at 17:03 |
|
Right before I left I was making a phone call and putting on my coat by the entrance to the pavilion, and there was hardly no crowd by a group of these things. Looks like some people didn't know what they were missing.